- In what well known and historically significant appellate court decision should one of the members of the tribunal been recused, at least by today’s standards, probably by him/her-self, or, if not in that way, by other members of the court, and if not in either of those ways, then by some other authoritative means?
- Who is that member of the tribunal?
- What is the reason recusal should have happened? (And if there is more than one reason, what are they?)
Originally posted on 03/01/2013 @ 9:59 pm